← Back to news
June 29, 2026
Supreme Court's Conservative Justices Criticize 'Actual Malice' Standard in Dershowitz Case
- Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented in the Supreme Court's decision not to hear Alan Dershowitz's defamation case against CNN, arguing the 'actual malice' standard is excessively stringent.
- The dissenting justices criticized the reliance on the 1964 precedent set in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, suggesting it is disconnected from constitutional principles.
- Dershowitz claims CNN misrepresented his comments during Trump's impeachment trial, but he was unable to prove actual malice, which the dissenting justices believe should be reevaluated.
6 Sources
- Supreme Court turns away Alan Dershowitz's defamation case against CNNJun 29, 2026 at 1:44 PM · CBS News
- US Supreme Court won't revive lawyer Alan Dershowitz's case against CNNJun 29, 2026 at 1:47 PM · Reuters
- Thomas, Gorsuch say Supreme Court should revisit landmark libel rulingJun 29, 2026 at 1:51 PM · The Hill
- Supreme Court won’t revive Alan Dershowitz’s $300 million lawsuit against CNNJun 29, 2026 at 2:26 PM · Independent
- Supreme Court declines to hear Alan Dershowitz appeal in defamation caseJun 29, 2026 at 6:00 PM · NBC
- Thomas, Gorsuch target landmark ruling Trump says protects the 'fake news'Jun 29, 2026 at 6:12 PM · Fox News